GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning) vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash

GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning) vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
8.40
Total cost
-
MiniMaxMiniMax-M3.1-FlashOff the frontier
Intelligence
42.70
Total cost
$283
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning)MiniMax-M3.1-FlashDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)8.442.7+408.3% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 5.1× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$283.18— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)9.86s25.34s+157.0% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 157.0% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.30 / $0.90$0.15 / $0.60
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning): what beats itMiniMax-M3.1-Flash: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6v/minimax-m3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6v/minimax-m3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill