GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning) vs Mistral Small 3.1

GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning) vs Mistral Small 3.1. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
8.40
Total cost
-
MistralMistral Small 3.1Off the frontier
Intelligence
7.10
Total cost
$27.8
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning)Mistral Small 3.1Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)8.47.1−15.5% Mistral Small 3.1 is 15.5% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$27.82— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)8.97s11.25s+25.4% Mistral Small 3.1 is 25.4% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.30 / $0.90$0.08 / $0.14
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning): what beats itMistral Small 3.1: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6v/mistral-small-3-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6v/mistral-small-3-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill