GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct

GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
8.40
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen3 30B A3B 2507 InstructNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.50
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning)Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 InstructDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)8.47.5−10.7% Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 In… is 10.7% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)9.10s3.42s−62.4% Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 In… is 62.4% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.30 / $0.90$0.10 / $0.30
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning): what beats itQwen3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6v/qwen3-30b-a3b-2507 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6v/qwen3-30b-a3b-2507?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill