GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning)

GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
8.40
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen3.5 4B (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
13.10
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning)Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)8.413.1+56.0% Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning) is 56.0% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)9.86s170.08s+1624.9% Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning) is 1624.9% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.30 / $0.90$0.03 / $0.15
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image, Video
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning): what beats itQwen3.5 4B (Reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6v/qwen3-5-4b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6v/qwen3-5-4b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill