GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3.5 Omni Plus

GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3.5 Omni Plus. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
8.40
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen3.5 Omni PlusNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
20.40
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning)Qwen3.5 Omni PlusDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)8.420.4+142.9% Qwen3.5 Omni Plus is 2.4× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)9.10s6.28s−31.0% Qwen3.5 Omni Plus is 31.0% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.30 / $0.90$0.40 / $4.80
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image, Speech, Video
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning): what beats itQwen3.5 Omni Plus: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6v/qwen3-5-omni-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6v/qwen3-5-omni-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill