GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3.7 Max

GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3.7 Max. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
8.40
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen3.7 MaxOff the frontier
Intelligence
29.50
Total cost
$2277
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning)Qwen3.7 MaxDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)8.429.5+251.2% Qwen3.7 Max is 3.5× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$2,277.12— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)9.86s16.61s+68.5% Qwen3.7 Max is 68.5% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.30 / $0.90$2.50 / $7.50
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning): what beats itQwen3.7 Max: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6v/qwen3-7-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6v/qwen3-7-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill