GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning) vs Step 3.5 Flash

GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning) vs Step 3.5 Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
8.40
Total cost
-
StepFunStep 3.5 FlashNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
16.60
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning)Step 3.5 FlashDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)8.416.6+97.6% Step 3.5 Flash is 97.6% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)9.01s19.59s+117.4% Step 3.5 Flash is 117.4% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.30 / $0.90$0.10 / $0.30
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning): what beats itStep 3.5 Flash: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6v/step-3-5-flash-0202 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6v/step-3-5-flash-0202?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill