GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-4o mini

GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-4o mini. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
10.60
Total cost
-
OpenAIGPT-4o miniNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
6.70
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning)GPT-4o miniDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)10.66.7−36.8% GPT-4o mini is 36.8% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)6.35s5.60s−11.8% GPT-4o mini is 11.8% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.07 / $0.40$0.15 / $0.60
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning): what beats itGPT-4o mini: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-flash-non-reasoning/gpt-4o-mini · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-flash-non-reasoning/gpt-4o-mini?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill