GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-5 nano (Medium)
GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-5 nano (Medium). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning) | GPT-5 nano (Medium) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 10.6 | 12.5 | +17.9% GPT-5 nano (Medium) is 17.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.35s | 37.40s | +489.0% GPT-5 nano (Medium) is 489.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.07 / $0.40 | $0.05 / $0.40 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-flash-non-reasoning/gpt-5-nano-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-flash-non-reasoning/gpt-5-nano-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill