GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium)

GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
10.60
Total cost
-
OpenAIGPT-6.1 Sol (Medium)On the frontier
Intelligence
47.80
Total cost
$361
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning)GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)10.647.8+350.9% GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) is 4.5× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$361.37— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)6.35s13.60s+114.2% GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) is 114.2% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.07 / $0.40$2.00 / $10.0
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning): what beats itGPT-6.1 Sol (Medium): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-flash-non-reasoning/gpt-6-1-sol-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-flash-non-reasoning/gpt-6-1-sol-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill