GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-6 Astra (Max)

GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-6 Astra (Max). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
10.60
Total cost
-
OpenAIGPT-6 Astra (Max)Off the frontier
Intelligence
52.70
Total cost
$5324
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning)GPT-6 Astra (Max)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)10.652.7+397.2% GPT-6 Astra (Max) is 5.0× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$5,324.10— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)6.25s280.51s+4388.2% GPT-6 Astra (Max) is 4388.2% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.07 / $0.40$10.0 / $50.0
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning): what beats itGPT-6 Astra (Max): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-flash-non-reasoning/gpt-6-astra · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-flash-non-reasoning/gpt-6-astra?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill