GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-6 Luna (Max)

GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-6 Luna (Max). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
10.60
Total cost
-
OpenAIGPT-6 Luna (Max)On the frontier
Intelligence
38.10
Total cost
$122
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning)GPT-6 Luna (Max)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)10.638.1+259.4% GPT-6 Luna (Max) is 3.6× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$122.05— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)6.35s84.41s+1229.3% GPT-6 Luna (Max) is 1229.3% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.07 / $0.40$0.10 / $0.50
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning): what beats itGPT-6 Luna (Max): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-flash-non-reasoning/gpt-6-luna · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-flash-non-reasoning/gpt-6-luna?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill