GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning) vs LongCat 2.0

GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning) vs LongCat 2.0. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
10.60
Total cost
-
LongCatLongCat 2.0Off the frontier
Intelligence
19.10
Total cost
$545
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning)LongCat 2.0Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)10.619.1+80.2% LongCat 2.0 is 80.2% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$544.74— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)6.47s35.69s+451.6% LongCat 2.0 is 451.6% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.07 / $0.40$0.75 / $2.95
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning): what beats itLongCat 2.0: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-flash-non-reasoning/longcat-2-0 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-flash-non-reasoning/longcat-2-0?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill