GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning) vs MiniMax-M2.5

GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning) vs MiniMax-M2.5. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
10.60
Total cost
-
MiniMaxMiniMax-M2.5Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
22.80
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning)MiniMax-M2.5Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)10.622.8+115.1% MiniMax-M2.5 is 2.2× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)6.47s43.10s+566.2% MiniMax-M2.5 is 566.2% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.07 / $0.40$0.30 / $1.20
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning): what beats itMiniMax-M2.5: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-flash-non-reasoning/minimax-m2-5 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-flash-non-reasoning/minimax-m2-5?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill