GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning) vs o3

GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning) vs o3. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
10.60
Total cost
-
OpenAIo3Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
20.20
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning)o3Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)10.620.2+90.6% o3 is 90.6% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)6.59s10.44s+58.4% o3 is 58.4% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.07 / $0.40$2.00 / $8.00
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning): what beats ito3: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-flash-non-reasoning/o3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-flash-non-reasoning/o3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill