GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning) vs o4-mini (High)

GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning) vs o4-mini (High). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
10.60
Total cost
-
OpenAIo4-mini (High)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
16.70
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning)o4-mini (High)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)10.616.7+57.5% o4-mini (High) is 57.5% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)6.59s28.44s+331.6% o4-mini (High) is 331.6% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.07 / $0.40$1.10 / $4.40
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning): what beats ito4-mini (High): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-flash-non-reasoning/o4-mini · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-flash-non-reasoning/o4-mini?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill