GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)

GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
10.60
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)Off the frontier
Intelligence
15.60
Total cost
$661
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning)Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)10.615.6+47.2% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 47.2% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$661.29— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)6.18s21.36s+245.6% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 245.6% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.07 / $0.40$0.40 / $3.20
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning): what beats itQwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-flash-non-reasoning/qwen3-5-122b-a10b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-flash-non-reasoning/qwen3-5-122b-a10b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill