GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct

GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning)Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B InstructDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)10.66.0−43.4% Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B In… is 43.4% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)6.23s7.07s+13.5% Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B In… is 13.5% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.07 / $0.40$0.25 / $0.97
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, Speech, Video
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-flash-non-reasoning/qwen3-omni-30b-a3b-instruct · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-flash-non-reasoning/qwen3-omni-30b-a3b-instruct?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill