GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning) vs GPT-4o (May '24)
GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning) vs GPT-4o (May '24). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning) | GPT-4o (May '24) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 14.9 | 7.3 | −51.0% GPT-4o (May '24) is 51.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 33.60s | 5.10s | −84.8% GPT-4o (May '24) is 84.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.07 / $0.40 | $5.00 / $15.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-flash/gpt-4o-2024-05-13 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-flash/gpt-4o-2024-05-13?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill