GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning) vs GPT-5.5 (Low)

GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning) vs GPT-5.5 (Low). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
14.90
Total cost
-
OpenAIGPT-5.5 (Low)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
30.70
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning)GPT-5.5 (Low)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)14.930.7+106.0% GPT-5.5 (Low) is 2.1× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)30.94s8.12s−73.8% GPT-5.5 (Low) is 73.8% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.07 / $0.40$5.00 / $30.0
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning): what beats itGPT-5.5 (Low): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-flash/gpt-5-5-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-flash/gpt-5-5-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill