GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning) vs GPT-5.6 Luna (Max)

GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning) vs GPT-5.6 Luna (Max). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
14.90
Total cost
-
OpenAIGPT-5.6 Luna (Max)Off the frontier
Intelligence
37.30
Total cost
$320
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning)GPT-5.6 Luna (Max)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)14.937.3+150.3% GPT-5.6 Luna (Max) is 2.5× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$319.93— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)32.00s85.38s+166.8% GPT-5.6 Luna (Max) is 166.8% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.07 / $0.40$0.20 / $1.20
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning): what beats itGPT-5.6 Luna (Max): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-flash/gpt-5-6-luna · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-flash/gpt-5-6-luna?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill