GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning) vs GPT-6 Luna (Low)

GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning) vs GPT-6 Luna (Low). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
14.90
Total cost
-
OpenAIGPT-6 Luna (Low)On the frontier
Intelligence
21.50
Total cost
$10.6
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning)GPT-6 Luna (Low)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)14.921.5+44.3% GPT-6 Luna (Low) is 44.3% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$10.63— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)30.96s6.80s−78.0% GPT-6 Luna (Low) is 78.0% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.07 / $0.40$0.10 / $0.50
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning): what beats itGPT-6 Luna (Low): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-flash/gpt-6-luna-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-flash/gpt-6-luna-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill