GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning) vs Grok 4.7 (Low)

GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning) vs Grok 4.7 (Low). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
14.90
Total cost
-
SpaceXAIGrok 4.7 (Low)Off the frontier
Intelligence
42.20
Total cost
$1631
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning)Grok 4.7 (Low)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)14.942.2+183.2% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 2.8× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$1,630.69— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)32.05s11.26s−64.9% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 64.9% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.07 / $0.40$2.00 / $6.00
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning): what beats itGrok 4.7 (Low): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-flash/grok-4-7-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-flash/grok-4-7-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill