GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning) vs Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)

GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning) vs Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
14.90
Total cost
-
Multiverse ComputingQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
26.70
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning)Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)14.926.7+79.2% Quasar 438B (Max, Bas… is 79.2% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)32.65s16.26s−50.2% Quasar 438B (Max, Bas… is 50.2% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.07 / $0.40$0.11 / $0.33
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning): what beats itQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-flash/quasar-438b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-flash/quasar-438b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill