GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 Instruct

GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 Instruct. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
14.90
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen3 235B A22B 2507 InstructNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
12.00
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning)Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 InstructDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)14.912.0−19.5% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 19.5% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)32.00s14.26s−55.4% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 55.4% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.07 / $0.40$0.21 / $0.84
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning): what beats itQwen3 235B A22B 2507 Instruct: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-flash/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-flash/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill