GLM-4.7 (Non-reasoning) vs GLM-5.3 (Low)

GLM-4.7 (Non-reasoning) vs GLM-5.3 (Low). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.7 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
17.40
Total cost
-
Z AIGLM-5.3 (Low)Off the frontier
Intelligence
34.30
Total cost
$1013
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.7 (Non-reasoning)GLM-5.3 (Low)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)17.434.3+97.1% GLM-5.3 (Low) is 97.1% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$1,012.50— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)15.22s30.79s+102.3% GLM-5.3 (Low) is 102.3% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.53 / $2.10$1.40 / $4.40
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.7 (Non-reasoning): what beats itGLM-5.3 (Low): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-non-reasoning/glm-5-3-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-non-reasoning/glm-5-3-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill