GLM-4.7 (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh)

GLM-4.7 (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.7 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
17.40
Total cost
-
OpenAIGPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh)Off the frontier
Intelligence
45.40
Total cost
$365
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.7 (Non-reasoning)GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)17.445.4+160.9% GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) is 2.6× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$364.95— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)15.25s18.82s+23.4% GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) is 23.4% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.53 / $2.10$1.00 / $5.00
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.7 (Non-reasoning): what beats itGPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-non-reasoning/gpt-6-1-terra-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-non-reasoning/gpt-6-1-terra-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill