GLM-4.7 (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-6 Astra (High)

GLM-4.7 (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-6 Astra (High). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.7 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
17.40
Total cost
-
OpenAIGPT-6 Astra (High)Off the frontier
Intelligence
50.90
Total cost
$2925
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.7 (Non-reasoning)GPT-6 Astra (High)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)17.450.9+192.5% GPT-6 Astra (High) is 2.9× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$2,925.01— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)15.73s45.44s+188.9% GPT-6 Astra (High) is 188.9% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.53 / $2.10$10.0 / $50.0
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.7 (Non-reasoning): what beats itGPT-6 Astra (High): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-non-reasoning/gpt-6-astra-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-non-reasoning/gpt-6-astra-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill