GLM-4.7 (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B

GLM-4.7 (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.7 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
17.40
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen2.5 Instruct 72BNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.70
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.7 (Non-reasoning)Qwen2.5 Instruct 72BDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)17.47.7−55.7% Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B is 55.7% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)15.48s22.76s+47.0% Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B is 47.0% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.53 / $2.10$0.47 / $0.49
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.7 (Non-reasoning): what beats itQwen2.5 Instruct 72B: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-non-reasoning/qwen2-5-72b-instruct · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-non-reasoning/qwen2-5-72b-instruct?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill