GLM-4.7 (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct

GLM-4.7 (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.7 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
17.40
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen3 30B A3B 2507 InstructNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.50
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.7 (Non-reasoning)Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 InstructDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)17.47.5−56.9% Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 In… is 56.9% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)15.27s3.42s−77.6% Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 In… is 77.6% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.53 / $2.10$0.10 / $0.30
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.7 (Non-reasoning): what beats itQwen3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-non-reasoning/qwen3-30b-a3b-2507 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-non-reasoning/qwen3-30b-a3b-2507?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill