GLM-4.7 (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 32B (Reasoning)

GLM-4.7 (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 32B (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.7 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
17.40
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen3 32B (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.20
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.7 (Non-reasoning)Qwen3 32B (Reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)17.47.2−58.6% Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) is 58.6% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)15.48s91.88s+493.5% Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) is 493.5% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.53 / $2.10$0.24 / $0.54
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.7 (Non-reasoning): what beats itQwen3 32B (Reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-non-reasoning/qwen3-32b-instruct-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-non-reasoning/qwen3-32b-instruct-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill