GLM-4.7 (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3.6 Plus

GLM-4.7 (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3.6 Plus. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.7 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
17.40
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen3.6 PlusNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
27.00
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.7 (Non-reasoning)Qwen3.6 PlusDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)17.427.0+55.2% Qwen3.6 Plus is 55.2% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)15.22s110.88s+628.5% Qwen3.6 Plus is 628.5% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.53 / $2.10$0.50 / $3.00
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, Video
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.7 (Non-reasoning): what beats itQwen3.6 Plus: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-non-reasoning/qwen3-6-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-non-reasoning/qwen3-6-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill