GLM-4.7 (Reasoning) vs GLM-5.2 (Max)

GLM-4.7 (Reasoning) vs GLM-5.2 (Max). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.7 (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
22.20
Total cost
-
Z AIGLM-5.2 (Max)Off the frontier
Intelligence
33.70
Total cost
$2097
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.7 (Reasoning)GLM-5.2 (Max)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)22.233.7+51.8% GLM-5.2 (Max) is 51.8% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$2,097.29— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)72.38s30.10s−58.4% GLM-5.2 (Max) is 58.4% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.53 / $2.10$1.40 / $4.40
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.7 (Reasoning): what beats itGLM-5.2 (Max): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7/glm-5-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7/glm-5-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill