GLM-4.7 (Reasoning) vs GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)

GLM-4.7 (Reasoning) vs GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.7 (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
22.20
Total cost
-
Z AIGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
22.40
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.7 (Reasoning)GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)22.222.4+0.9% GLM-5.2 (Non-reasonin… is 0.9% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)71.38s3.91s−94.5% GLM-5.2 (Non-reasonin… is 94.5% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.53 / $2.10$1.40 / $4.40
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.7 (Reasoning): what beats itGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7/glm-5-2-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7/glm-5-2-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill