GLM-4.7 (Reasoning) vs GPT-4.1 nano

GLM-4.7 (Reasoning) vs GPT-4.1 nano. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.7 (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
22.20
Total cost
-
OpenAIGPT-4.1 nanoNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.80
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.7 (Reasoning)GPT-4.1 nanoDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)22.27.8−64.9% GPT-4.1 nano is 64.9% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)71.38s2.87s−96.0% GPT-4.1 nano is 96.0% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.53 / $2.10$0.10 / $0.40
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.7 (Reasoning): what beats itGPT-4.1 nano: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7/gpt-4-1-nano · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7/gpt-4-1-nano?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill