GLM-4.7 (Reasoning) vs GPT-5 nano (High)

GLM-4.7 (Reasoning) vs GPT-5 nano (High). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.7 (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
22.20
Total cost
-
OpenAIGPT-5 nano (High)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
13.00
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.7 (Reasoning)GPT-5 nano (High)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)22.213.0−41.4% GPT-5 nano (High) is 41.4% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)71.62s81.92s+14.4% GPT-5 nano (High) is 14.4% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.53 / $2.10$0.05 / $0.40
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.7 (Reasoning): what beats itGPT-5 nano (High): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7/gpt-5-nano · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7/gpt-5-nano?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill