GLM-4.7 (Reasoning) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (High)

GLM-4.7 (Reasoning) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (High). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.7 (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
22.20
Total cost
-
OpenAIGPT-6.1 Sol (High)On the frontier
Intelligence
50.20
Total cost
$521
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.7 (Reasoning)GPT-6.1 Sol (High)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)22.250.2+126.1% GPT-6.1 Sol (High) is 2.3× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$521.32— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)71.38s45.58s−36.1% GPT-6.1 Sol (High) is 36.1% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.53 / $2.10$2.00 / $10.0
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.7 (Reasoning): what beats itGPT-6.1 Sol (High): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7/gpt-6-1-sol-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7/gpt-6-1-sol-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill