GLM-4.7 (Reasoning) vs GPT-6 Luna (Medium)

GLM-4.7 (Reasoning) vs GPT-6 Luna (Medium). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.7 (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
22.20
Total cost
-
OpenAIGPT-6 Luna (Medium)On the frontier
Intelligence
29.90
Total cost
$31.2
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.7 (Reasoning)GPT-6 Luna (Medium)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)22.229.9+34.7% GPT-6 Luna (Medium) is 34.7% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$31.17— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)72.38s8.25s−88.6% GPT-6 Luna (Medium) is 88.6% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.53 / $2.10$0.10 / $0.50
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.7 (Reasoning): what beats itGPT-6 Luna (Medium): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7/gpt-6-luna-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7/gpt-6-luna-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill