GLM-4.7 (Reasoning) vs Mercury 2.5

GLM-4.7 (Reasoning) vs Mercury 2.5. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.7 (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
22.20
Total cost
-
InceptionMercury 2.5Off the frontier
Intelligence
12.30
Total cost
$218
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.7 (Reasoning)Mercury 2.5Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)22.212.3−44.6% Mercury 2.5 is 44.6% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$218.11— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)71.62s4.33s−94.0% Mercury 2.5 is 94.0% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.53 / $2.10$0.25 / $0.75
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.7 (Reasoning): what beats itMercury 2.5: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7/mercury-2-5 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7/mercury-2-5?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill