GLM-4.7 (Reasoning) vs Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)

GLM-4.7 (Reasoning) vs Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.7 (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
22.20
Total cost
-
Multiverse ComputingQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
26.70
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.7 (Reasoning)Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)22.226.7+20.3% Quasar 438B (Max, Bas… is 20.3% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)72.38s15.88s−78.1% Quasar 438B (Max, Bas… is 78.1% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.53 / $2.10$0.11 / $0.33
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.7 (Reasoning): what beats itQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7/quasar-438b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7/quasar-438b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill