GLM-4.7 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)

GLM-4.7 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.7 (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
22.20
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)Off the frontier
Intelligence
21.40
Total cost
$1145
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.7 (Reasoning)Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)22.221.4−3.6% Qwen3.6 27B (Reasonin… is 3.6% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$1,145.36— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)72.38s112.14s+54.9% Qwen3.6 27B (Reasonin… is 54.9% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.53 / $2.10$0.60 / $3.60
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, Video
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.7 (Reasoning): what beats itQwen3.6 27B (Reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7/qwen3-6-27b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7/qwen3-6-27b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill