GLM-4.5 (Reasoning) vs Phi-3 Mini Instruct 3.8B

GLM-4.5 (Reasoning) vs Phi-3 Mini Instruct 3.8B. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.5 (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
12.80
Total cost
-
MicrosoftPhi-3 Mini Instruct 3.8BNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
5.80
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.5 (Reasoning)Phi-3 Mini Instruct 3.8BDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)12.85.8−54.7% Phi-3 Mini Instruct 3… is 54.7% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.5 (Reasoning): what beats itPhi-3 Mini Instruct 3.8B: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4.5/phi-3-mini · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4.5/phi-3-mini?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill