GLM-5.1 (Non-reasoning) vs gpt-oss-120b (High)

GLM-5.1 (Non-reasoning) vs gpt-oss-120b (High). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-5.1 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
24.20
Total cost
-
OpenAIgpt-oss-120b (High)Off the frontier
Intelligence
11.60
Total cost
$123
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-5.1 (Non-reasoning)gpt-oss-120b (High)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)24.211.6−52.1% gpt-oss-120b (High) is 52.1% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$122.71— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)9.17s12.38s+35.0% gpt-oss-120b (High) is 35.0% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.38 / $4.40$0.15 / $0.60
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-5.1 (Non-reasoning): what beats itgpt-oss-120b (High): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-1-non-reasoning/gpt-oss-120b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-1-non-reasoning/gpt-oss-120b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill