GLM-5.1 (Non-reasoning) vs Mercury 2.5
GLM-5.1 (Non-reasoning) vs Mercury 2.5. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | GLM-5.1 (Non-reasoning) | Mercury 2.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.2 | 12.3 | −49.2% Mercury 2.5 is 49.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | $218.11 | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.86s | 4.18s | −52.8% Mercury 2.5 is 52.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.38 / $4.40 | $0.25 / $0.75 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-1-non-reasoning/mercury-2-5 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-1-non-reasoning/mercury-2-5?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill