GLM-5.1 (Non-reasoning) vs Mistral Medium 3.5
GLM-5.1 (Non-reasoning) vs Mistral Medium 3.5. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | GLM-5.1 (Non-reasoning) | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.2 | 14.2 | −41.3% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 41.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | $1,263.80 | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 9.17s | 17.96s | +95.9% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 95.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.38 / $4.40 | $1.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-1-non-reasoning/mistral-medium-3-5 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-1-non-reasoning/mistral-medium-3-5?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill