GLM-5.1 (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)
GLM-5.1 (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | GLM-5.1 (Non-reasoning) | Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.2 | 15.6 | −35.5% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 35.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | $661.29 | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.56s | 21.22s | +147.9% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 147.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.38 / $4.40 | $0.40 / $3.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-1-non-reasoning/qwen3-5-122b-a10b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-1-non-reasoning/qwen3-5-122b-a10b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill