GLM-5.1 (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct

GLM-5.1 (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-5.1 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
24.20
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
9.60
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-5.1 (Non-reasoning)Qwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)24.29.6−60.3% Qwen3 Next 80B A3B In… is 60.3% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)9.17s5.18s−43.5% Qwen3 Next 80B A3B In… is 43.5% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.38 / $4.40$0.10 / $1.10
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-5.1 (Non-reasoning): what beats itQwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-1-non-reasoning/qwen3-next-80b-a3b-instruct · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-1-non-reasoning/qwen3-next-80b-a3b-instruct?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill