GLM-5.1 (Non-reasoning) vs Beam 1.0
GLM-5.1 (Non-reasoning) vs Beam 1.0. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | GLM-5.1 (Non-reasoning) | Beam 1.0 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.2 | 30.3 | +25.2% Beam 1.0 is 25.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | $318.73 | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 9.10s | 7.79s | −14.4% Beam 1.0 is 14.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.38 / $4.40 | $0.40 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-1-non-reasoning/reflection-beam · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-1-non-reasoning/reflection-beam?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill