GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) vs Ministral 3 3B
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) by Z AI or Ministral 3 3B by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) scores 21.3 points higher (26.1 vs 4.8) but costs 122× as much to run the benchmark ($1487 vs $12.2; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) when you need intelligence above 4.8, and Ministral 3 3B when 4.8 is enough.
| Metric | GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) | Ministral 3 3B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.1 | 4.8 | −81.6% Ministral 3 3B is 81.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,486.78 | $12.23 | −99.2% Ministral 3 3B is 99.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 63.24s | 3.07s | −95.1% Ministral 3 3B is 95.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.28 / $4.07 | $0.10 / $0.10 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Ministral 3 3B vs GLM-5.1 (Reasoning): 81.6% less intelligence, 99.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 95.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Ministral 3 3B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
GLM-5.1 (Reasoning)Ministral 3 3BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-1/ministral-3-3b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-1/ministral-3-3b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill