GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) vs Muse Glimmer (High)
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) by Z AI or Muse Glimmer (High) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) scores 8.6 points higher (26.1 vs 17.5) but costs 10× as much to run the benchmark ($1487 vs $146; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) when you need intelligence above 17.5, and Muse Glimmer (High) when 17.5 is enough.
| Metric | GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) | Muse Glimmer (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.1 | 17.5 | −33.0% Muse Glimmer (High) is 33.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,486.78 | $145.77 | −90.2% Muse Glimmer (High) is 90.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 60.76s | 24.76s | −59.2% Muse Glimmer (High) is 59.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.28 / $4.07 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Muse Glimmer (High) vs GLM-5.1 (Reasoning): 33.0% less intelligence, 90.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 59.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Muse Glimmer (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
GLM-5.1 (Reasoning)Muse Glimmer (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-1/muse-glimmer · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-1/muse-glimmer?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill